ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom located in New York. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to get stories such as this one in your inbox when they are published. How can this be beneficial to you? For just one, this feature enables you to find organizations that provided grants or loans to other nonprofits.
Any nonprofit that provides grants to some other must list those grants on its taxes forms – meaning that you can research a nonprofit’s funding by using our search. A search for “ProPublica,” for example, provides up dozens of foundations that have given us grants to fund our reporting (as well as a few filings that guide Nonprofit Explorer itself). Just another example: When private foundations have investments or ownership fascination with for-profit companies, they have to list those on their taxes filings as well.
- Automobile expenditures
- Product variety
- 30 to 35
- What is the status of private LTE rollouts and public basic safety MVNO offerings across the globe
- Single filers with a MAGI of $200,000
- Had balance of $25,000 in CIMB FastSaver at the first month
If you want to analyze which foundations have investments in an organization like ExxonMobil, for example, you can simply search for the business name and check which organizations list it as an investment. The possibilities are almost limitless. 100,000 from a nonprofit, searching for addresses, keywords in mission descriptions or claims of accomplishments.
You can even use advanced search operators, so for example you can find any processing that mentions either “THE BRAND NEW York Times,” “nytimes” or “nytimes.com” in one search. The new feature contains every electronically filed Form 990, 990-PF and 990-EZ released by the IRS from 2011 to time. That’s 3 million filings nearly. The search does not include forms filed in some recoverable format. So please, give this search a spin. In the event that you write a whole tale using information out of this search, or you find bugs or problems, drop us a line! We’re excited to see what you all do with this new superpower.
To them, the status quo of how exactly we approve housing is not working. And I’m sure for Susan, that might be terrifying to remove housing approvals and also to take that historic power from smaller cities where it’s existed throughout California’s history and I would say which political reality to this.
We try the South Bay, a whole lot of suburban communities. Elected officials who have been supportive of more development, got bounced this election, whether it was the Mayor of Mountain View, the council members in Los Altos as well. So there’s a genuine fear, I believe, at the local level ‘if I approve a certain project or if I appear to be too pro-development, I’m disappointing my constituents and I may no more have this position’.
So I think it’s a pull really to take that voice away from local council members who are actually at the mercy of their constituents kind of as their job is. Rachael Myrow: Well, let me challenge you using one point, which is not saying that local politicians do an especially good job of holding developers feet to the fire.
But whenever a designer is proposing a project, that’s the instant to ask about traffic mitigation, about local park resources, about other activities like that. Do we see anything in this course of action, going forward, to help protect the grade of life in these areas where the construction is going to happen? Guy Marzorati: Well I think even in a few of the streamlining proposals that you see in CASA, there is allowable for some meetings that exceed just a ministerial approval in a certain year.